Insurance Info

This is taken from a couple of Talon Digest posts.

From:     Greg Rowe m1tanker@mn.rr.com Date:     02 May 2001 00:55:13

Here is the best advice I can give you regarding handling an insurance claim as an ex auto claims adjuster with over 7 years experience. If you have any questions regarding a claim e-mail and I'll help you.

Information on how to deal with an Insurance company after a loss.
Total Loss Vehicles:

SGT Greg Rowe
'90 Eagle Talon AWD 'Little Monster'

[One thing I wondered about. If they are not willing to give you any extra money for the mods you add, don't you have the legal right to remove them from the car, even if they are going to condemn the car? -talon mgr]

Yes, the main caveat is that the vehicle can't be disabled by what you removed. Examples: If you pull off your 3" exhaust, you need to put something back on. If you pull off your 17's, you need to put some type of wheels and tires back on. All your HKS electronics can be pulled if the car will still run without it. I know sometimes the adjuster won't care and will let you pull off the whole exhaust if the engine was damaged and the car won't run anyways. This can help you get back a lot of your missing money. Sell the parts to others and ask for their stock parts. If you keep salvage you can strip anything off that you want. Salvage company may not give you as much if you do something crazy and pull the engine and drivetrain as than they can't sell that part.


From:     Greg Rowe m1tanker@mn.rr.com Date:     02 May 2001 01:44:56

>Say a policy holder hits a newer car, and causes $5000 in
>damage. No big deal, the company covers it. Now say the same person hits
>a '90 Talon, and does the same $5000 in damage. Should the insurance
>company get a break and total the car for $3000, screwing the victim?
>Most states, if not all, have a minimum property damage requirement. I
>think CA is like $15,000, way too low now a days. If the insurance
>company is contracted to pay up to $15,000, why should it matter how
>much the car is worth? They should be required to return the car to it's
>original condition, even if it costs more then the car is "worth." Now
>say the role is reversed- the policy holder wipes out a $40,000 BMW.
>Will the insurance company graciously cover the difference? I didn't
>think so.

No, the insurance company won't cover the additional amount. The rate you pay for that $15K is based on a number of factors. The first and most important is the amount of coverage you want. You agree with your insurance company that you will pay x$ for x amount of coverage. If you want more you have to pay more. The second most important is the risk involved on that policy. The major factor for your example is that they are agreeing to gamble on you (and their other insureds) and the fact that you are not going to get in an accident and if you do that it will not do $15,000 damage every time. If the company didn't do this, they would just charge you $15,000 for a $15,000 policy. This is the way insurance works.

In your example, the insurance companies cost on the Talon claim would have increased by about 66%. Say that this average is the across the board results of doing business the way you have talked about. No problem for the companies, they just increase the rates for all of their policy holders by 66%. This means you. If all companies did this then you would pay more for your policy as they paid more for claims. Remember also that your insurance rates go down as your car gets older and loses value. It's not going down because repair costs go down (that never happens). If you don't want your car to be totaled by your own company because of its lower value, you're going to pay more. You can wonder all you want how things might be. I'm just showing you the reality. This society has decided the rules and regulations of the insurance industry through its laws. This society has also required you to have insurance. If you can think of a better way to do this, open up the new type of insurance company you would prefer. Watch how fast people stay with their cheaper insurance policies that total cars rather than repair everything.

BTW, regarding your statement about never having a newer totaled car be the same. It's actually easier to rebuild a newer totaled car than an older one. The newer one has newer parts that are easily available. A 10 year old car is harder to bring back as it has 10 years of potholes, rust build-up, faded-hard to match paint and 10 years of abuse on it. Try getting the 10 year old paint to match the new paint and try to get that 10 year old interior to match that new interior door panel.

SGT Greg Rowe
'90 Eagle Talon AWD 'Little Monster'

[Here's another thing I've wondered. In California, you can "self-insure" by posting a bond with the state. Can such a person do the same thing insurance companies do with totalling vs. repairing cars? -talon mgr]


Credits


This document can be reprinted for personal use or reference for your mechanic(s) with no prior permission needed. It can be linked to directly, as long as you have a link to the main VFAQ page of http://www.vfaq.com, though linking to the main page instead is preferred. This document can NOT be reprinted for profit/resale/redistribution of ANY type without expressed WRITTEN permission from me in advance. Bulk copying of this document onto your web site without prior permission will not be tolerated, link to it instead.
Last modified: May 4, 2001
Copyright 2001, Greg Rowe, Tom Stangl
VFAQ.COM, http://www.vfaq.com
talonts